ADHD Pro
LibraryPRO Library
PRO Card Library

Evidence card list

2026-02-11 — Non-medication supports, parent training, school collaboration, executive function, teacher training (11 cards)

No previousNext pack
Evidence Map

This pack at a glance

Non-medication and school-support evidence should be read by age group, setting, delivery method, and limits rather than as one-size-fits-all advice.

001

NICE ADHD Guideline for Children: Non-Pharmacological Intervention Recommended as First-Line

GuidelineLevel ANICE / Clinical Guideline / Parent Training / Behavioral Intervention / Non-Pharmacological / Environmental Modification

Result: This is a comprehensive Clinical Guideline encompassing Environmental Modification, school support, and Psychoeducation as part of a multi-layered support system.

002

AAP Guideline: Behavioral Intervention First for Under 6

GuidelineLevel AAAP / Clinical Guideline / Behavioral Intervention / Parent Training / Under 6 / Combination

Result: Parent Training, School-Based Intervention, and behavioral management are emphasized as core Non-Pharmacological strategies.

003

International ADHD Guideline Comparison: Commonalities and Differences

Systematic ReviewLevel BGuideline Comparison / International / NICE / AAP / CADDRA / Non-Pharmacological

Result: Differences exist in specific recommendations across agencies/regions, making cross-referencing useful.

004

Summary of Non-Pharmacological ADHD Interventions in Schools

Systematic ReviewLevel BSchool-Based Intervention / Classroom Management / Self-Regulation Training / Non-Pharmacological / Systematic Review

Result: Published in 2015, it is recommended to also consider more recent research findings that have accumulated since then.

005

Non-Pharmacological Interventions and Executive Function (2023 Meta-Analysis)

Meta-AnalysisLevel A~BNon-Pharmacological / Executive Function / Meta-Analysis / Cognitive Training / Attention / Effect Size

Result: Effect sizes varied depending on the type of intervention and measurement methods.

006

Pharmacological vs. Non-Pharmacological ADHD Intervention Comparison (Network Meta-Analysis)

Meta-AnalysisLevel A~BNetwork Meta-Analysis / Pharmacological Comparison / Non-Pharmacological / Effect Size / Comparative Effectiveness

Result: This study provides comparative information and does not recommend or prescribe any specific treatment.

007

Family–School Collaboration ADHD Intervention: Daily Report Card (DRC) Model

RCTLevel BFamily–School Collaboration / Daily Report Card / DRC / Parent Training / Teacher Consultation / RCT

Result: A study demonstrating the potential of a model where home and school collaborate with a consistent strategy.

008

Incredible Years Parent Training: IPD Meta-Analysis Results

Meta-AnalysisLevel A~BIncredible Years / Parent Training / IPD Meta-Analysis / Parenting Skills / Behavior Problems

Result: The target age range was 3–8 years (preschool to early elementary), suggesting the potential of early intervention.

009

Incredible Years ADHD-Specific Evidence: Efficacy Level Review

Systematic ReviewLevel BIncredible Years / ADHD-Specific / Efficacy Level / Critical Review / Parent Training

Result: The specified efficacy level for the ADHD-specific application can serve as a reference when selecting programs.

012

Korean Multimedia Parent Training Program (Pilot Study)

RCT (Pilot)Level C (Reference)Korea / Parent Training / Multimedia / Pilot Study / Parenting Stress

Result: Valuable as Korean-language Parent Training evidence, though limited by its small scale as a preliminary study.

013

Effects of ADHD Teacher Training Programs (Meta-Analysis)

Meta-AnalysisLevel A~BTeacher Training / Classroom Management / Meta-Analysis / School-Based Intervention / ADHD Awareness

Result: However, full-text access is restricted (paywalled), so this summary is based on the abstract.

Card Pack

11 cards

Existing 2026-02-11 English detail paths and source href/label values are preserved. This screen is the PRO-library entry point for the eleven existing English card details.

001

NICE ADHD Guideline for Children: Non-Pharmacological Intervention Recommended as First-Line

GuidelineNICE NG87Level A

Result: This is a comprehensive Clinical Guideline encompassing Environmental Modification, school support, and Psychoeducation as part of a multi-layered support system.

002

AAP Guideline: Behavioral Intervention First for Under 6

GuidelinePMID 31570648Level A

Result: Parent Training, School-Based Intervention, and behavioral management are emphasized as core Non-Pharmacological strategies.

003

International ADHD Guideline Comparison: Commonalities and Differences

Systematic ReviewPMID 37313730Level B

Result: Differences exist in specific recommendations across agencies/regions, making cross-referencing useful.

004

Summary of Non-Pharmacological ADHD Interventions in Schools

Systematic ReviewDOI 10.3310/hta19450Level B

Result: Published in 2015, it is recommended to also consider more recent research findings that have accumulated since then.

005

Non-Pharmacological Interventions and Executive Function (2023 Meta-Analysis)

Meta-AnalysisPMID 37450981Level A~B

Result: Effect sizes varied depending on the type of intervention and measurement methods.

006

Pharmacological vs. Non-Pharmacological ADHD Intervention Comparison (Network Meta-Analysis)

Meta-AnalysisDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0180355Level A~B

Result: This study provides comparative information and does not recommend or prescribe any specific treatment.

007

Family–School Collaboration ADHD Intervention: Daily Report Card (DRC) Model

RCTPMID 22399304Level B

Result: A study demonstrating the potential of a model where home and school collaborate with a consistent strategy.

008

Incredible Years Parent Training: IPD Meta-Analysis Results

Meta-AnalysisPMID 28696032Level A~B

Result: The target age range was 3–8 years (preschool to early elementary), suggesting the potential of early intervention.

009

Incredible Years ADHD-Specific Evidence: Efficacy Level Review

Systematic ReviewDOI 10.1177/1063426617717740Level B

Result: The specified efficacy level for the ADHD-specific application can serve as a reference when selecting programs.

012

Korean Multimedia Parent Training Program (Pilot Study)

RCT (Pilot)PMID 24639936Level C (Reference)

Result: Valuable as Korean-language Parent Training evidence, though limited by its small scale as a preliminary study.

013

Effects of ADHD Teacher Training Programs (Meta-Analysis)

Meta-AnalysisDOI 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101928Level A~B

Result: However, full-text access is restricted (paywalled), so this summary is based on the abstract.

Use This Pack

What to do after reading

Use the cards to prepare questions about non-medication supports, parent training, school collaboration, and teacher support. Do not treat them as diagnosis or treatment instructions.

Sources

Source check

Source href and visible source labels are preserved from the existing English detail files.

Card
Topic
Source
001
NICE ADHD Guideline for Children: Non-Pharmacological Intervention Recommended as First-Line
002
AAP Guideline: Behavioral Intervention First for Under 6
003
International ADHD Guideline Comparison: Commonalities and Differences
004
Summary of Non-Pharmacological ADHD Interventions in Schools
005
Non-Pharmacological Interventions and Executive Function (2023 Meta-Analysis)
006
Pharmacological vs. Non-Pharmacological ADHD Intervention Comparison (Network Meta-Analysis)
007
Family–School Collaboration ADHD Intervention: Daily Report Card (DRC) Model
008
Incredible Years Parent Training: IPD Meta-Analysis Results
009
Incredible Years ADHD-Specific Evidence: Efficacy Level Review
012
Korean Multimedia Parent Training Program (Pilot Study)
013
Effects of ADHD Teacher Training Programs (Meta-Analysis)
Notice and limits
  • This screen supports evidence reading inside the PRO library and does not direct diagnosis, treatment, prescribing, or medication choice.
  • Parent-training and school-support decisions should be discussed with qualified professionals who know the child, family, and school context.
  • Group-level findings should not be transferred directly to an individual case without considering fit, feasibility, and limits.